The European Commission fined Gucci, Chloé and Loewe a combined €157 million ($182 million) for fixing resale prices, highlighting growing governance and antitrust risks for investors.
Key Takeaways
• The European Commission fined Gucci (Kering), Chloé (Richemont), and Loewe (LVMH) a combined €157 million ($182 million) for anti-competitive price-fixing across EU markets
• Price-fixing represents a governance and ethical risk, exposing weaknesses in oversight, compliance, and internal controls
• Investors should monitor governance controversies in real time to manage regulatory, reputational, and valuation risks within portfolios
What happened?
The European Commission has fined luxury brands owned by Kering [EPA: KER], Richemont [SIX: CFR], and LVMH [EPA: MC] a combined €157 million ($182 million) for anti-competitive pricing practices that restricted cross-border sales within the EU.
EU regulators determined that Gucci (Kering), Chloé (Richemont), and Loewe (LVMH) coordinated to control resale prices and restrict cross-border sales, breaching Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
By preventing distributors from offering lower prices in other member states, the brands artificially maintained high retail prices for consumers.
Fine breakdown:
Gucci - owned by Kering [EPA: KER] - €119.7 million
Chloé - owned by Richemont [SIX: CFR] - €19.7 million
Loewe - owned by LVMH [EPA: MC] - €18 million
Total: €157 million ($182 million)
Why price-fixing is an ESG risk factor
Price-fixing is more than a competition law breach - it signals governance and ethical failures that erode investor trust.
From an ESG perspective, these actions reveal:
• Governance weaknesses - inadequate oversight and compliance controls
• Ethical lapses - poor accountability within senior management
• Risk-management gaps - limited monitoring of distribution and pricing conduct
Anti-competitive behaviour undermines market integrity and transparency, core principles of sustainable corporate governance.
Why this matters (for managers)
For asset managers, ESG analysts and all investment professionals, governance controversies of this kind carry clear implications:
• Financial impact - fines and legal expenses affect earnings and cash flow
• Reputational damage - brand equity and consumer trust can be weakened
• Regulatory pressure - heightened scrutiny can raise compliance costs
• Portfolio exposure - governance failures can drive ESG rating downgrades and valuation risk
Monitoring governance-related controversies in real time helps investors anticipate market response and manage exposure before value erosion occurs.
Track governance failures before they impact value
At Integrum ESG, we equip investors with the data and intelligence needed to identify ESG controversies early.
Our Platform combines transparent, credible and auditable ESG analytics with a real-time ESG sentiment and controversies tracker. Powered by AI, it monitors over 47,000 news and social media sources to detect when sentiment around a company’s ESG performance is shifting.
By flagging governance, conduct and compliance risks before they escalate into full controversies, Integrum helps investors avoid exposure to reputational damage, regulatory penalties and value erosion across their portfolios.
ESG Intelligence which is fast, transparent and affordable - only on the Integrum Platform.